Showing posts with label WTC collapse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WTC collapse. Show all posts

November 29, 2007

Insanely Callous 9/11 Medical Examiner

Maybe some of us with a bit of spare time can write or call the Representatives below to give them support:

Hero cop who died after WTC work
denied memorial honor roll place
BY KIRSTEN DANIS and CORKY SIEMASZKO
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
Tuesday, November 27th 2007, 4:00 AM
Mayor Bloomberg Monday turned his back on a hero cop who died after working at Ground Zero but was denied a place on the memorial honor roll because he didn't arrive at The Pile until two days after the Sept. 11 attacks.
Bloomberg also flatly rejected a renewed call for a special panel to set scientific and legal standards for reviewing the deaths of 9/11 workers like Officer James Godbee.
[…] the city's medical examiner, Dr. Charles Hirsch, told Godbee's widow her husband's death would remain classified as from "natural" causes because he was not at the site on the day of the terror attacks.
[…] The former Marine got to Ground Zero two days later and spent hundreds of hours working in the toxic stew. A physical fitness buff, Godbee was felled by a heart attack in December 2004. He was 44 years old.
[…] "The medical examiner was asked to rule on whether or not the legal definition of death is homicide," he said. "This is strictly the legal definition based on what the law is, and the medical examiner made a finding. They did not look at what the actual cause of death was."
That legalistic approach dismayed Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Carolyn Maloney, both Manhattan Democrats, and Vito Fossella, a Republican from Staten Island.
"It seems clear that an otherwise healthy man who worked for countless hours on The Pile at Ground Zero and who later developed sarcoidosis and died should have his case heard by the city's medical examiner," they wrote.
"At the very least, there should not be an arbitrary 'cutoff' for who can be considered a victim of 9/11. Many who are sick now were not at Ground Zero the moment the towers collapsed - but their suffering and medical conditions are real." http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/11/27/2007-11-27_hero_cop_who_died_after_wtc_work_denied_-1.html

More 9/11 Health Troubles

Asthma rates up in kids near WTC
By KATHLEEN LUCADAMODAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Thursday, November 29th 2007, 4:00 AM
[…] Children who were exposed to dust from the collapsing twin towers had higher-than-expected rates of asthma after the catastrophe, a report released Wednesday shows
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/11/29/2007-11-29_asthma_rates_up_in_kids_near_wtc.html

November 21, 2007

We Want 9/11 Truth

EXPERTS FURTHER DEBUNK 9-11 FAIRY TALE
EXPERTS SAY FEDERAL LINE IMPOSSIBLE,
TOWER COLLAPSES NEED INVESTIGATION
By Mark Anderson
San Francisco architect Richard Gage sees the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s current position on 9-11 as an absurd “smoke and mirrors” show that further reveals that NIST never inquired about how the World Trade Center’s twin towers were destroyed on 9/11/01, and that NIST admits to not having any answers on what actually caused the “global collapse.”
[…]NIST stated that it found “no corroborating evidence to suggest that explosives were used to bring down the buildings.” But in the next sentence the letter says: “NIST did not conduct tests for explosive residue and as noted above, such tests would not necessarily have been conclusive.”
[…]Gage pointed out that NIST doesn’t even attempt to go beyond the point of collapse initiation because they cannot explain the varied evidence of explosives being used at the WTC, including the lateral ejection of massive steel beams that were blown up to 500 feet away from the towers.
[…]even more startling is the fact that an intense six-floor fire on the 11th story of the north tower erupted on Feb. 13, 1975 and burned for more than three hours, hot enough to prompt Capt. Harold Kull of NYFD Engine No. 6 to tell The New York Times, “It was like fighting a blowtorch.”
The fire, estimated to exceed 700 degrees Celsius, was hot enough to blow out windows on the 11th floor’s east side, from which flames were seen shooting out. None of the steel trusses was even replaced; at no time could the entire building have collapsed.
http://americanfreepress.net/html/debunk_9-11.html
Here's an older report from Rense.com:
OKC & WTC-7 - The CaseFor Controlled Demolitions
By Douglas Herman Exclusive to Rense.com, 10-7-6
[…] To either side of WTC-7 stood the Verizon building and the US Post Office building. Arguably the Verizon building stood much closer to the North Tower, yet neither suffered the extent of damages as WTC-7. Why not? Neither did the two adjacent buildings suffer the rash of suspicious fires--more than a dozen---that ravaged the highly sensitive and secure US government building, WTC-7.
Highly coincidental or highly suspicious?
NIST acknowledged no fires within WTC-7 prior to 12 noon on September 11, 2001. If the Twin Towers had already collapsed over an hour earlier, how did these numerous fires start? Flaming aluminum debris and steel beams ejected 400 feet inside the WTC-7? Or arson fires set by a secret team?
http://www.rense.com/general73/okc.htm

November 13, 2007

Rudy's 9/11 Albatross

News just in from Sander Hicks and 9/11 truth seekers in Colorado. Please note the Giuliani campaign has assigned "cheerleaders" to try to drown out questions from patriots:
This Saturday, alongside new activist groups We Are Change, Colorado, and Truth Alliance, I helped to insert some political dialogue into a Rudolf Giuliani campaign event, north of Denver in Loveland, Colorado. We came well prepared and organized to ask about 9/11.
According to the media coverage, 9/11 skeptics stole the show. We Are Change has posted video, which is original footage followed by Fox and ABC's versions:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7475540276815636499&q=loveland+giuliani&total=2&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
It's 16 Minutes long. Don't miss these highlights:
At 6:41, Giuliani admits "There are conspiracy theorists all over." (!)
At 7:11 he unleashes a demonic cackle as I ask my question, and then get assaulted by police.
What really happened on Saturday was a reporter and independent publisher was grabbed for asking a sensitive question. 9/11 is Giuliani's one political strong point, but to people who know more about 9/11, it's his albatross.

...I asked the most relevant question about Giuliani. He has been asked about this before, in a different phrasing, by 9/11 Victims family member, Sabrina Rivero, [here's the original link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4n7uJnKGTGg] on May 29, 2007. Giuliani lied to her.
…I prepared as a professional journalist, and had a good hard question that cited its sources.
That question was:
"Six Years ago, on 9/11/01, you told Peter Jennings, 'we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse.' Who told you? Why were the firefighters not informed?"
…I had prepared by watching the ABC news footage of Giuliani himself saying this, which you can see, here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hNmf76GUCw&eurl=http://wearechangecolorado.org/
MEDIA CLIPS: See Google News, or Denver Post, and MSNBC:

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/10/459736.aspx
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_7427708
My initial blog entry on this: http://www.gnn.tv/B25752