EXPERTS FURTHER DEBUNK 9-11 FAIRY TALEEXPERTS SAY FEDERAL LINE IMPOSSIBLE,
TOWER COLLAPSES NEED INVESTIGATION
By Mark Anderson
By Mark Anderson
San Francisco architect Richard Gage sees the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s current position on 9-11 as an absurd “smoke and mirrors” show that further reveals that NIST never inquired about how the World Trade Center’s twin towers were destroyed on 9/11/01, and that NIST admits to not having any answers on what actually caused the “global collapse.”
[…]NIST stated that it found “no corroborating evidence to suggest that explosives were used to bring down the buildings.” But in the next sentence the letter says: “NIST did not conduct tests for explosive residue and as noted above, such tests would not necessarily have been conclusive.”
[…]Gage pointed out that NIST doesn’t even attempt to go beyond the point of collapse initiation because they cannot explain the varied evidence of explosives being used at the WTC, including the lateral ejection of massive steel beams that were blown up to 500 feet away from the towers.
[…]even more startling is the fact that an intense six-floor fire on the 11th story of the north tower erupted on Feb. 13, 1975 and burned for more than three hours, hot enough to prompt Capt. Harold Kull of NYFD Engine No. 6 to tell The New York Times, “It was like fighting a blowtorch.”
The fire, estimated to exceed 700 degrees Celsius, was hot enough to blow out windows on the 11th floor’s east side, from which flames were seen shooting out. None of the steel trusses was even replaced; at no time could the entire building have collapsed.
http://americanfreepress.net/html/debunk_9-11.html
Here's an older report from Rense.com:
[…]NIST stated that it found “no corroborating evidence to suggest that explosives were used to bring down the buildings.” But in the next sentence the letter says: “NIST did not conduct tests for explosive residue and as noted above, such tests would not necessarily have been conclusive.”
[…]Gage pointed out that NIST doesn’t even attempt to go beyond the point of collapse initiation because they cannot explain the varied evidence of explosives being used at the WTC, including the lateral ejection of massive steel beams that were blown up to 500 feet away from the towers.
[…]even more startling is the fact that an intense six-floor fire on the 11th story of the north tower erupted on Feb. 13, 1975 and burned for more than three hours, hot enough to prompt Capt. Harold Kull of NYFD Engine No. 6 to tell The New York Times, “It was like fighting a blowtorch.”
The fire, estimated to exceed 700 degrees Celsius, was hot enough to blow out windows on the 11th floor’s east side, from which flames were seen shooting out. None of the steel trusses was even replaced; at no time could the entire building have collapsed.
http://americanfreepress.net/html/debunk_9-11.html
Here's an older report from Rense.com:
OKC & WTC-7 - The CaseFor Controlled Demolitions
By Douglas Herman Exclusive to Rense.com, 10-7-6
[…] To either side of WTC-7 stood the Verizon building and the US Post Office building. Arguably the Verizon building stood much closer to the North Tower, yet neither suffered the extent of damages as WTC-7. Why not? Neither did the two adjacent buildings suffer the rash of suspicious fires--more than a dozen---that ravaged the highly sensitive and secure US government building, WTC-7.
Highly coincidental or highly suspicious?
NIST acknowledged no fires within WTC-7 prior to 12 noon on September 11, 2001. If the Twin Towers had already collapsed over an hour earlier, how did these numerous fires start? Flaming aluminum debris and steel beams ejected 400 feet inside the WTC-7? Or arson fires set by a secret team?
http://www.rense.com/general73/okc.htm
[…] To either side of WTC-7 stood the Verizon building and the US Post Office building. Arguably the Verizon building stood much closer to the North Tower, yet neither suffered the extent of damages as WTC-7. Why not? Neither did the two adjacent buildings suffer the rash of suspicious fires--more than a dozen---that ravaged the highly sensitive and secure US government building, WTC-7.
Highly coincidental or highly suspicious?
NIST acknowledged no fires within WTC-7 prior to 12 noon on September 11, 2001. If the Twin Towers had already collapsed over an hour earlier, how did these numerous fires start? Flaming aluminum debris and steel beams ejected 400 feet inside the WTC-7? Or arson fires set by a secret team?
http://www.rense.com/general73/okc.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment