Showing posts with label Condoleezza Rice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Condoleezza Rice. Show all posts

November 21, 2008

Airbridge Denial Program: Murder in the Andean Skys

Report says CIA withheld info from White House
Fri Nov 21
The CIA withheld information from the White House, Justice Department and Congress about the 2001 shooting down of a plane over Peru carrying an American missionary family, part of a years long cover-up of lethal violations in U.S. drug-interdiction procedures, according to a classified internal CIA report.
Michigan Rep. Pete Hoekstra, [my bold] the senior Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, called for a criminal investigation and said Congress would hold hearings on the matter in the new year.
[...] The CIA inspector general’s report dated Aug. 25, excerpts of which were released Thursday, said the agency hid from Congress, the National Security Council and Justice Department the results of multiple internal investigations that documented “sustained and significant” violations of White House-sanctioned aircraft intercept procedures. The procedures were created to prevent the shooting down of innocent aircraft over the Amazon jungle like the April 2001 downing of the missionaries’ aircraft.
“The plane, following the Amazon River in its westward journey in daylight, was tracked by a CIA aircraft as a suspected narcotrafficker and was fired on by the Peruvian Air Force. A Michigan woman and her infant daughter were killed and the American pilot was seriously wounded. The woman’s husband and son survived.
“Within hours, CIA officers began to characterize the shootdown as a one-time mistake in an otherwise well-run program. In fact, this was not the case,” the report says.
Missionary Veronica "Ronnie" Bowers, 35, and her seven-month-old adopted daughter, Charity, were both killed when their single-engine plane was riddled with bullets before ditching into the Amazon River. [They were working for the Association of Baptists for World Evangelism]
A report released by the State Department in 2001 said the CIA aircraft initially identified the plane but then grew concerned that it was an innocent flight. But it was too late — given language problems and established procedures — to prevent the Peruvian fighter from firing.
According to the report, many aircraft [my bold] were shot down by Peruvian fighter aircraft within two to three minutes of being spotted “without being properly identified, without being given the required warnings to land and without being given time to respond to such warnings as were given to land.”
The Peruvian fighter jets often did not give targeted aircraft any visible signals they had been intercepted before they were shot down. [my bold] [This means “suspects” are tried, convicted and murdered in cold blood thout benefit of a hearing, in a New York minute] Nevertheless, between 1995 and 2001 the CIA "incorrectly reported that the program complied with the laws and policies governing it."
The IG report said Peruvians and Americans participating in the counternarcotics program explained that they violated the procedures because they thought them too time-consuming and worried they "might have resulted in the escape of the target aircraft."
"Violations of required procedures occurred in every shoot-down the CIA took part in" [my bold] for the six years of the CIA's Airbridge Denial Program with Peru, Hoekstra said.
The number of shoot-downs was not made public.
The report says the CIA specifically withheld information from then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. Rice asked the CIA on several occasions who had approved the change in procedures.
The investigation "found no evidence that any Agency officer ever responded to her request for information, despite the fact that certain senior agency managers were aware of the agency's own findings that the (program) had not fully complied with presidential requirements," the report states.
It also suggests the cover-up was sanctioned by the agency's top attorney. [my bold]
The CIA's Office of General Counsel advised agency managers to avoid producing written reports [my bold] about the incident "to avoid both criminal charges against agency officers and civil liability," the report says.
The classified version of the report identified personnel by name who, Hoekstra said, misled Congress and obstructed the Justice Department investigation into whether criminal charges should have been filed in the case. Justice ultimately decided against filing charges.
[...] CIA Director Michael Hayden has made no decisions regarding the IG's recommendations, but has asked a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard Myers, to advise him, according to an official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal CIA matters. Myers, a former fighter pilot, is an expert in air interdiction operations.
CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield pledged the agency's full cooperation. He said the CIA will consider all of the facts to determine the way forward.
"This situation obviously calls for careful deliberations that will result in sound, fair decisions," Mansfield said.
http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20081121/US.Missionaries.Shootdown/
The Transnational Institute has studied and reported on this issue and I strongly urge interested readers to click on the link below to read the full report. Following is the final paragraph of their conclusion:
[...] Government repression, increasingly militarized, thus finds itself before an "enemy" ever more disperse, far flung, and socially variegated. In sum, they find themselves criminalizing poverty and in confrontation with ever larger sectors of society, a recipe for social disaster and greater, more generalized violence. In countries with weak democracies and/or increasing levels of social violence and repression, these "side effects" of the US's drug war "remedy" may prove more detrimental than the narco-trafficking disease.
http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?page=reports_drugs_drugwar

February 2, 2008

Blame Canada!

As usual the neocons and repuglicans found a scapegoat for their doomed policies. But the world is waking up to the horrors of what we have done to Afghanistan in our murderous drive for world domination.

Rice heads for London as Afghan crisis looms

· Row escalates over Nato troop reinforcements

· Canada may withdraw unless others do more

Ian Black and Patrick Wintour, Saturday February 2, 2008

The Guardian

Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, is to fly to London next week to tackle an escalating row over Nato troop reinforcements for Afghanistan, amid worries that the entire international stabilisation strategy is in danger of failing.

[...] Alliance divisions burst into the open earlier yesterday with a US demand that Germany, whose forces are in the relatively stable north, send combat troops and helicopters to the volatile south.

[...] German chancellor Angela Merkel made clear that the limited mandate was "not up for discussion".

On Thursday [Robert] Gates met similar opposition from his French counterpart, Hervé Morin, in talks in

Washington. The mood in Paris and Berlin threatens a damaging replay of the transatlantic spats in the run up to the Iraq war five years ago.

[...] But the immediate crisis has been triggered by Canada, which has threatened to bring home its 2,500 troops from Kandahar, next to Helmand province where British forces are fighting the resurgent Taliban insurgency, unless other allies send reinforcements.

[...] Wrangling over the number of boots on the ground coincides with a flurry of warnings that the entire effort to stabilise Afghanistan could fail because of resurgent Taliban violence and a looming humanitarian crisis. On Wednesday the former US Nato commander, General James Jones, suggested Afghanistan was in danger of becoming a "failed state" because there were "too few military forces and insufficient economic aid". Oxfam separately urged troop and aid-contributing countries to undertake "a major change in direction".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,,2251139,00.html

January 11, 2008

Tonkin Gulf or Strait of Hormuz: SSDD

CIA, Iran & the Gulf of Tonkin
By Ray McGovern, January 12, 2008
When the Tonkin Gulf incident took place in early August 1964, I was a journeyman CIA analyst in what Condoleezza Rice refers to as “the bowels of the agency.”
Out of that experience I must say that, as much as one might be tempted to laugh at the bizarre theatrical accounts of Sunday’s incident involving small Iranian boats and U.S. naval ships in the Strait of Hormuz, this is—as my old Russian professor used to insist—nothing to laugh.
The situation is so reminiscent of what happened—and didn’t happen—from Aug. 2-4, 1964, in the Gulf of Tonkin and in Washington, it is in no way funny.
[...] What follows is written primarily for honest intelligence analysts and managers still on “active duty.”
[...] Given the confusion last Sunday in the Persian Gulf, you need to remember that a “known known” in the form of a non-event has already been used to sell a major war—Vietnam. It is not only in retrospect that we know that no attack occurred that night.
[...] As James Bamford describes it in “Body of Secrets:”
“The twin missions of the [USS] Maddox were in a sense symbiotic. The vessel’s primary purpose was to act as a seagoing provocateur—to poke its sharp gray bow and the American flag as close to the belly of North Vietnam as possible, in effect shoving its 5-inch cannons up the nose of the Communist navy. In turn, this provocation would give the shore batteries an excuse to turn on as many coastal defense radars, fire control systems, and communications channels as possible, which could then be captured by the men...at the radar screens. The more provocation, the more signals...
[...] We in the bowels knew there was no attack; and so did the Director of Current Intelligence as well as Cline, the Deputy Director for Intelligence. But all knew, as did McNamara, that President Johnson was lusting for a pretext to strike the North and escalate the war. And, like B’rer Rabbit, they didn’t say nothin’.
[...] “... the dilemma CIA directors and senior intelligence professionals face in cases when they know that unvarnished intelligence judgments will not be welcomed by the President, his policy managers, and his political advisers...[They] must decide whether to tell it like it is (and so risk losing their place at the President’s advisory table), or to go with the flow of existing policy by accentuating the positive (thus preserving their access and potential influence). In these episodes from the Vietnam era, we have seen that senior CIA officers more often than not tended toward the latter approach.”
[...] Back to Iran. This time, we all know what the president and vice president are lusting after—an excuse to attack Iran. But there is a big difference from the situation in the summer of 1964, when President Johnson had intimidated all his senior subordinates into using deceit to escalate the war.
[...] It is my view that the only thing that has prevented Bush and Cheney from attacking Iran so far has been the strong opposition of the uniformed military, including the Joint Chiefs.
As the misadventure last Sunday in the Strait of Hormuz shows, our senior military officers need all the help they can get from intelligence officers more concerned with the truth than with “keeping lines open to the White House” and doing its bidding.
[...] If you’re working in the bowels of the CIA and you find that your leaders are cooking the intelligence once again into a recipe for casus belli, think long and hard about your oath to protect the Constitution. Should that oath not transcend any secrecy promise you had to accept as a condition of employment?
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/011108a.html

December 9, 2007

No Basi USA In Italia!

United States Citizens for Peace & Justice is very active in promoting peace, supporting the grass roots movements to get US out of Italy, promote nuclear disarmament, basically all the good work we need to support. Anyone passing by might want to take time to join this demonstration. Italians, by and large want to be free of US intervention, and most have memories of games the CIA played during post-war elections. This could be the start of something very big.
Dear peace activists,
On Saturday, December 15 at 7am the USC4P&J Peace Bus takes off: destination Vicenza and the international demonstration against the new U.S. military base at Dal Molin! Seats are going fast. Reserve yours now:
http://webmaila.juno.com/webmail/new/8?folder=Inbox&msgNum=0000NLk0:0017MjL1000015uE&block=1&msgNature=all&msgStatus=all&count=1197183399&content=central. Cost E. 25-30. We will stay overnight and arrive back in Rome Sunday afternoon. The folks in Vicenza will do their best to provide accommodations; please let us know as soon as possible.
The aggressive policies of the U.S., which have been the focus of our group since the beginning, would not be possible without the logistical support provided by the network of U.S. military bases on foreign soil. Let's join the people of Vicenza in their determination to stop the construction of the new base at Dal Molin and throw a wrench into the gears of the war machine.
See the fantastic video ad produced by the Presidio Permanente No Dal Molin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2jrdTanHz4
Desiree Fairooz, the CodePink activist who confronted Condoleezza Rice with "blood" on her hands, will be there as well as David Swanson, co-founder of AfterDowningStreet.org and impeachment activist extraordinaire. Representatives of movements throughout Europe, including the Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, Belgium and Hungary, will also be there. And Eve Tetaz is coming. She´s a 76-year-old activist from Washington DC who´s been arrested 9 times this year! She´s coming to Europe in order to stay out of trouble, but still plans to make good use of her time!
We´re also expecting others from the U.S. citizens groups in France and Germany.
Join us! Our voice is especially important here. And if we don´t stand up to the U.S. military in our free and democratic countries, how can we expect the oppressed peoples of the world to do so?
See our web site for more information on the 3-day mobilization: http://www.peaceandjustice.it/vicenza-dec-15.php
For any questions, contact us at: http://webmaila.juno.com/webmail/new/8?folder=Inbox&msgNum=0000NLk0:0017MjL1000015uE&block=1&msgNature=all&msgStatus=all&count=1197183399&content=central

November 2, 2007

Rice Appeal

Well, there you go. It didn't take long:
Rice makes appeal as US diplomats resist forced duty in Iraq

7 hours ago

Jack Crotty, a member of the foreign service for 36 years, was among the most vocal, calling the forced deployment to the US embassy in Baghdad or in so-called provincial reconstruction teams in Iraq a "potential death sentence."
"You know that, in any other embassy in the world, the embassy would be closed at this point," Crotty said to applause by those present.
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5h4I6ATuvRDh6vDUpI9tIA1PjW0Bg


October 24, 2007

Boiled Rice

Watch as Condosleeza gets slammed by Code Pink in this video: http://www.thestar.com/fpLarge/video/270034